thesis:
Using a literary lens, I’ll be analyzing the effectiveness of 21st century political propaganda by their conventions, rhetorics, and affordances/constraints.
Outline:
-why it is important to understand rhetorics in political campaigning)
-How barack used a smart slogan to appeal to voters and proved his political poster is successful
-Political propaganda can be found outside of presidential elections
-Common era posters with an indirect audience and its effectiveness
Reflection
my initial organizational attempt was to point out the topics I would look at that prove a propaganda poster is effective, and how they're also different. political propaganda can be very different because its all about pushing a specific rhetoric, from a different side or argument. so introduced the opening paragraph after my introduction about things posters can all feature. then followed it with different examples that argue a different side from a different time period with different things happening within the time period, in term of politics. then i followed with constraints and what it could not do within its period.
moving, forward i need to better analyze my argument and get examples that better line up with it. i don't necessarily have to point out what it can or can not do in different paragraphs. i can put them all in the same paragraph when analyzing different examples, since i'm analyzing effectiveness then i can look at each one, how effective it was based off of the things i put in my thesis and compare those example's to the following examples. i truthfully also think my thesis isnt the best so that can use work.










